Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ancient Elmarit vs. Summicron, 90 mm
From: Herbert & Lee Kanner <kanner@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:12:51 -0700

I need a bit of advice on 90 mm lenses, although it will be a while 
before I can spring for one.  I have been following the KEH catalog, 
and, basically, for the older non-asph lenses, the f2 Summicron and 
the f2.8  Elmarit-M are approximately the same price.  So, is this 
just the vagaries of the market, or, is there any reason to believe 
that the Summicron of that vintage is optically  inferior to the 
Elmarit-M?

A couple of other question:--

One of the lenses in the listing is described as Tele-Elmarit-M, the 
others as Elmarit-M.  Is there as distinction and, if so, what is it?

The listings in the catalog look like: "90 F2.8 ELMARITO-M BLK (GER)(46)"
Is that last number the filter size?  If my guess is correct, it is 
interesting that the Elmarit-M shows 46mm and the Tele-Elmarit-M 
shows 39 mm.

Anyway, I'm swamped by the large choice in the ~$700 price class, and 
would appreciate some advice.

Herb
- -- 
Herbert Kanner
kanner@acm.org
650-326-8204

Replies: Reply from "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org> (Re: [Leica] Ancient Elmarit vs. Summicron, 90 mm)