Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hey Félix, Look at some lens resolution charts for Canon and Nikon lenses. They list resolution in two columns. On column for autofocus, one column for manual focus. Manual focus resolution is ALWAYS better than autofocus resolution. Why? Because an autofocus mechanism is incapable of "critical" focus. How do I know this? Because this is part of my work. I just wrote some autofocus algorithms and the electronic signal data that is returned from the AF sensors is incapable of making perceptual differences between being critically sharp and "just" being in focus. You either build a signal histogram in software or you get a digital voltage peak at the point where the camera electronics thinks what you are looking at is in focus. To the AF sensor, it's just numbers, and lots of them. No critical human brain involved. These sensors have a high rate of subject failure. They don't know what it is, specifically you want to focus on as they only see voltages. AF is OK for some tasks. But totally inept at many. And the problem is that you won't know it until you get the film processed. When you personally are focusing, well, the camera will deliver focus on exactly the part of the subject that you wanted in focus. Why? Because that is where you personally focused. Jim At 12:19 AM 6/2/01 +0200, Félix López de Maturana wrote: >"I'll gladly stand by my original statement, I already have the best >autofocus system ever devised, my brain (both sides), my right eye and one >of my hands (which one, is camera dependant)." > >Austin, > >Glorius...Perhaps you had to register this mechanism : the perfect >autofocus Austin's brain (both sides and up and down), eye and hand. Maybe >Canon or Nikon or other damned rubbish camera maker do wish to purchase it >it... > >Kind regards > >Félix