Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]seen much sporadic bashing of nikon's new RF offering. when i found one for less than the cost of a LHSA M6 and 50mm Summilux i decided to plunge. all i can say, as a long time leica user AND an SP owner/user, is that this camera is VERY special, and well "worth" what i paid for it (at least if you take it as a given that an m6 & summi combo are fairly priced). the build quality is unlike anything i've ever experienced in cameradom. the chrome, as barbara would say, is like butta. the finder is FAR brighter than my m6 (although strictly a coincident type), and the shutter is certainly quieter than my leica. while a rubberized cloth shutter a la leica M, it has a very different construction. i also did some aerial testing of the 50mm 1.4 (olympic style and dimensions) using a statndard chart. without providing numbers, it betters the leica summiux by a long shot in the corners at every stop, and in the center wide open down to f4. i think the new s3 is a very interesting product, worthy of a full blown review. as for the lens, apparently photodo.com is going to post some specs soon. perhaps the nicest thing about the camera is that there is nothing about it that says "special edition." just a brand spanking new s3. like i went back in time, and popped into olden. finally, i am puzzled by all the second guessing of nikon's decision to go with an s3 reissue, rather than a sp. for all its virtues, the sp had: 1. a much darker finder than the s3 (at least when the cameras were knew -- s3s tended to "tan" over time a la m2s) 2. the s3 had an improved, quieter shutter, 3. if you want frame lines wider than 35 and longer than 105, use accesory finders -- they work MUCH better at the extremes (as any leica m users knows all too well) than in-camera bright lines, and 4. they could sell an s3/50mm 1.4 combo at roughly the cost of the comparable leica rig (not counting rebates) -- an sp would have totally over the top. and by the way, no wooden box! d d d d d d d d d