Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Edward Mortimer wrote: > > Reminds me of a customer we had in the shop the other day. He was > considering purchasing a Nikon F100 plus a couple of zoom's. Then he asked > me what I would recommend buying with a £1500 budget. So I said that for the > same money he could get a good used Leica and lens. But alas he wasn't > having any of it, he turned his nose up at the thought of buying a purely > manual camera. > He wanted something with auto everything, more modes than he could remember, > auto focus-even though he still had the use of his hands, 3d matrix metering > because it sounded good... I'm not really bitter, honest I've got nothing > against auto-cameras, there essential for sports/press photography. Its just > that it got me that he would probably never use most of the features to full > effect. I could have sold him something that was simple, light,with pin > sharp results and extremely effective at capturing our world. The leica is > the obvious choice to me and I except that not everyone would feel the same. > I just feel that today alot of people buy cameras because of what it can > 'do' instead of whether it might compliment their image making. Mortimer, How courageous you are. I will never push anybody to buy a Leica M. I really think people have to discover what it is by themselves. Lucien