Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is what I'm doing. I used "step down" (my thinking being that I'm going from 46 to 39...down in my head). In any event, I believe we're saying the same thing, only differently. Lea Joe Codispoti wrote: > Try 39 to 46mm instead. It is far better to have filters for the largest > lens and adapters to that size for all other lenses. The minimal > circumference added on the 50mm lens will not impede viewing but restricting > the circumference of the 90mm might affect the image. > > Joe Codispoti > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "lea" <lea@whinydogpress.com> > To: "Leica" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:37 PM > Subject: [Leica] couple of quickies > > > Here's the scoop. I want to use filters on my Leica lenses but I don't > > want to buy a set for my 50mm and my 90mm. So I'm trying to find a step > > down ring that would allow me to purchase my filters in the 90mm size > > (46) and use them on the 50mm which is 39. Is there such a beast? I > > can't find one anywhere and my supplier isn't having much luck locating > > one either. Can't imagine I'm the first who has thought to do this. > > Input would be just wonderful. > > > > Also...is anyone using a diffusion chamber with a Beseler 23CII? I'd > > like to ask a couple questions if anyone is familiar with the setup. > > > > > > Many thanks. > > Lea > > > > -- > > Lea Murphy > > Whiny Dog Press > > 816-333-9111 > > Home: http://www.whinydogpress.com > > Newest: http://www.whinydogpress.com/new.html > > > > > > - -- Lea Murphy Whiny Dog Press 816-333-9111 Home: http://www.whinydogpress.com Newest: http://www.whinydogpress.com/new.html