Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: D400 New trial
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 14:06:30 -0700
References: <76.a5e4498.28297eb1@aol.com>

><Snip> 
> OTOH, I have never had a problem with Kodak anything, and that's with having
> used Kodak for 95% of my b&w over 45 years.. That's the reason I stick with
> Kodak b&w (except for 120 D 3200, for which there is no Kodak equivalent).
> Their stuff is always at least competitive, product for product, and
> dependable.
> 
> Necessary addendum: I have read posts by reliable practitioners about
> problems with Xtol, but in 2 years of use have not experienced any, myself.
> 
> Allen Zak

I agree! I'm all for Ilford and Agfa but when it comes much appreciated
consistency give me that little yellow box with the red type on it any day!
The occasion bad batch or box of Agfa is even less occasional!
Other than of course Kodachrome I'm a big user of 220 plus x,
and in the darkroom (never Kodak paper)

KISB	Kodak Indicator Stop bath
KRF	Kodak Rapid Fixer (A only) ...KRFA
KRST	Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner
KHCA	Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent

Mark Rapid Photographner

Oh and Dektol!!

and photoflo

yikes almost forgot Xtol!!!

In reply to: Message from ShadCat11@aol.com (Re: Re: [Leica] Re: D400 New trial)