Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lun 30 avr 2001 14:27:38 -0400 "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> a écrit: > How can you do CO2 tests in the exact same conditions, years later...the > winds, the temperature everything atmospheric will have some bearing on > the tests. Problem is, people can do/interpret tests to mean what THEY > want them to mean. It's a game. Is this a game as well [some (non-leica) pix]? http://www.solcomhouse.com/iceberg.htm Other pix and data here: http://www.natice.noaa.gov/ > I find this kind of stuff entirely funny. We KNOW that camera testing > is done with an EXTREME bias, in most cases, but amazing how some people > want to believe, without questions, tests that support THEIR point of > view. I don't find this funny at all, and it is far more serious than camera testing... Oddmund Garvik ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif