Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I finally got around to testing Fuji Neopan 1600 which I rated at 1600 and processed in XTOL using the published time. Those of you who recommended it as being better than TMZ weren't kidding at all. This stuff is amazing! In my opinion it's not a lot more grainy than my usual Delta 400, has a very similar "look" and is a true 1600 to boot! I posted the tests with some close up scans which I think show the grain and sharpness I'm getting. Perhaps some of you who have more experience with Neopan than me could take a look and let me know if I am getting the results I should? Who knows, maybe I can squeeze a little more out of this wonderful film. http://www.camera-craftsman.com/neopan.html Thanks! Simon Stevens