Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is very sensible for a designer not to try to optimize a lens beyond the level that the mechanical tolerances can allow for. Some people have objected to my remarks that many Cosina lenses show decentred elements as it has been interpreted as Cosina-bashing. It is not. Some older Leica lenses show this decentring too: it is the consequence of the tolerance level that is accepted or defined as the level of precision that is required for a given level of image quality or a given level of manufacturing precision. A designer and the company in which (s)he works knows what is possible or required and engineering is not sorcery: any additional minute of work costs money and more checks and frequent adjustments cost money too. Generally Cosina lenses are very good and surpass many of the older Leica designs. That is the power of modern computer programs and improved manufacturing technology. An intriguing question is this: do Cosina lenses show significant differences when stopped down to Leica lenses stopped down to the same aperture. My simple answer is yes. The advantages of Leica lenses are its tighter tolerances, use of better quality glass, advanced optimization and this shows at all apertures in higher micro contrast, higher transparancy (finer reproduction in high lights and shadow areas), lower level of residuals (finer differentiation of hues and tones in small details), greater fidelity of reproduction etc. All of this over the entire (or most of it) picture area. There is a diminishing return of course and at f/11 it would be quite difficult to see the difference. Here one has to insert a few caveats. If the photographer is not sensitive to subtle differences and does not do his own careful comparisons, these aspects may escape him/her. Listen to an orchestra conducted by two different directors and playing the same piece of music!. Some will here the differences immediately and some will not. A trained ear is needed. So is a trained eye. If the photographer's technique is sloppy or careless or if the material used is not up to the demands of the lens, many differences will be washed away by the generally very high noise level of the imaging chain. My view is this: the Cosina lenses deliver amazingly good image quality and many users will be served very well by this range of lenses, which expands at a remarkable speed. Generally they offer better imagery than many Leica lenses of the previous generation. Any one who raves about his Summicron DR should try the Nokton 1.5/50 and get an insight in optical progress made possible by current desighn programs and optical theory. Current Leica designs have a clear edge and you can appreciate that if you are willing to invest some time in the study of their characteristics. It is easy to gulp down a glass of superb wine and not note the difference in taste when compared to a cheaper wine. As any wine lover will tell you: take your time and chew! Erwin