Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Whatever!:-) Andrew Schroter wrote: > You mean 28-70 2.8 zoom, don't you? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 6:50 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Trashing > > >> Forgive me, but you guys are really amazing - How the chat works, what >> the software is, how fast it runs, etc., is all utterly irrelivant. The >> real question is: what will Leica do with and for the R line. And there >> was nothing on the "chat" to really tell you anything about that you did >> or didn't know before hand. Another Leica marketing tour-de-force. >> >> P. S. Nikon and Canon don't need to waste their time with chats: >> They are constantly updating their products and introducing truly >> innovative new one's - they don't have to listen to >> owners begging for something a rediculously basic as a 35-70 2.8 zoom. > > ;-) > >> B. D. >> Pascal wrote:. >> >>> On 01-04-2001 05:21, David E. Strang wrote: >>> >>>> Regarding the Leica chat, when was the last time Nikon or Canon offered >>> > to > >>>> involve users in future projects? Maybe in the future things will be >>>> smoother and those looking for a platform to trash Leica will step >>> > down. The > >>>> future is far too bright to let it pass without some positive input >>> > from > >>>> Leica's most vocal users. >>> >>> >>> I agree with you David. >>> >>> I hope Leica will learn from what happened on Friday and make future >>> chatting sessions less lacklustre (technically speaking) and more >>> informative. >>> >>> It could have a winner if it works this through. >>> >>> Pascal >>> NO ARCHIVE >>> >>> --------- >>> Visit my photo pages at http://members.nbci.com/cyberplace >>> --------- >>> <<< PGP public key available upon request >>> >>> >>> >>>