Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentialit ynotices/IIIf shutter noise
From: Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:48:40 -0600

And all I wanted to do was talk about Leica cameras? Seriously, I have
removed the disclaimer as I was able to do so, but I understand in some rare
cases others may not be able. How about something could be added to the home
page about this, informing potential new members that you would rather they
not use them and let us know in advance as we are signing up for membership
to the list? At least we could try and eliminate them before coming on line.

- -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Rabiner [mailto:mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:04 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm
confidentialitynotices/IIIf shutter noise


"Barker, J. Madison" wrote:
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> I guess we haven't had anyone from the big law firms until now!
> If they can't control their own email we could have them stay off!
> 
> Mark Rabiner
> 
> Portland, Oregon
> USA
> Updated ALL MY DESIGN webpage!!
> http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
> 
> *****
> 
> Mark, I've been here with my firm's default notice for some time.  It's
> drawn comment, even.  But I rarely post, and maybe you're filtering me
> anyway.  Whatever.  I'll comply with whatever rule Brian comes up with.
> Should we boot everyone with tag lines, even those flogging web pages in
> CAPITALS!!?!!
> 
> On topic:  My IIIf's shutter is considerably louder than my M6's.  I think
> someone posted recently that his III was about as quiet as an M.  I've
never
> been around LTM cameras much, other than my own.  Can some of those with
> broader experience comment?  TIA,
> 
> Matt Barker
> 
> ######################################################################
> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
> (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its
> authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally
> privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible
> for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended
> recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are
> hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying,
> printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained
> in it.  In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone
> (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at postmaster@kutakrock.com and
> delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any
> attachments) without reading or saving in any manner.
> 
> Thank you.
> ######################################################################

A hundred an seventy #'s on the wall.
And hundred and seventy #'s.
if one of those #'s should happen to fall
A hundred and sixty nine #'s on the wall...
and don't forget that delicious cream filling in between!

I'd think we'd have noticed big pice of crap like this.
As i said i noticed them a bit on other sites and was always relieved we
didn't
have them here.
Of course there is no significant difference between the above and the below
trailer posts.
...A slight blurring of details...
I busted a few caps down there....

This is NOT a lawyer thing. We've got plenty of lawyers on the list who
don't
drag their egos around behind them with big fat trailers ###'S.
Some of my best lawyers are friends.



Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA
http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
Chick the "personal work" Link!
and "tears" a few "family scans"

Replies: Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentialitynotices/IIIf shutter noise)
Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentialitynotices/IIIf shutter noise)