Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I recently referred to one of Doug Herr's shots of his daugther as a "great" "shapshot." I think of a snapshot as a photograph taken of a family or casual activity. Doug's shot was taken on a school outing to Yosemite. It's a great portrait of his daughter that chronicals a time and place in her life. It is an environmental portrait that shows her personality throught the frame. It shows strong love between the photographer and model. To me it is a "snapshot". But, to me, that photograph also shows that it was deliberately exposed, selected and exhibited by a photographer who knows his art. Is it an insult to refer to a photograph as a "snapshot" ? No way, it is a reference to a style not quality. I agree with Tina, "bad", "only" and other negative qualifiers are the insult. Doug Landrum