Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm no expert, but... As I understand it, all Noctilux f1.0's share the same optical formula, but there may be some minor differences in the coatings. (There are 4 separate versions; the first two of which were Canadian with differing detachable hoods and filter-size, the third is Canadian with a built-in hood, and the fourth is the current German model with built-in, retractable hood) The Noctilux f1.2 is of a different, and older optical formula, has collector appeal, but does not perform as well optically. The Canadian versions seem to sell used for US$300 to $500 less than the current version. I own and use a second version Noctilux on my M6TTL .72, and have no focusing or framing difficulties - meaning I get properly focused images even at f1 - but for me, focusing the Noctilux is a "slower" process than it is with my 50 Summicron. Jack Los Altos, California - ---- Original Message ----- From: "Mose, J P" <j.p.mose@lmco.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:06 AM Subject: [Leica] 50/1 Noctilux > Question for the Noctilux 50/1 experts out there, > > Of all the versions of 50/1 Noctilux's since 1976, which would be the best > one from a users standpoint (versus collectable) to purchase used? If they > are all basically the same, is there one that is more of a bargain? This > would be used on a M6TTL .72, mainly for concerts, museums or other > locations that won't allow flash, etc. (I actually like A. H. Schmidt's idea > of sitting in a German pub the best!). Hopefully, the lower magnification > won't be too much of an issue with this camera. Thanks again for your help. > > > J. P. Mose > >