Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Austin Franklin wrote: > > >> The problem of flare in the > > >> rangefinder > > >> is a solid, *factual* indication of the decline in quality > > from the M3 to > > >> the M6. > > > > > > Do you mean build quality, material quality...what quality are > > you referring > > > to? > > > > > > Well, this to me indicates a design flaw, but I am not > > well-enough versed in > > optical materials to determine whether it is a result of cost-cutting in > > that department as well. It is, however, unarguably a flaw. > > I agree the rangefinder flare problem IS a design flaw, but the poster > claimed that there was a "decline in quality", and I wanted to know what > 'quality' s/he meant. The M6 may be assembled 'better', materials may be > 'better', but those have nothing to do with a design flaw, so my point is, a > design flaw has nothing to do with 'quality', per se, depending on what you > mean by "quality". So, it sounds like you are saying this design flaw could be a high quality design flaw? and you really don't know what the quality level of this design flaw is. Is that your point here? Dennis