Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What is the point of this? Roland Smith - ----- Original Message ----- From: "imx" <imxputs@knoware.nl> To: "LUG" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 1:58 AM Subject: [Leica] Survival guide > We all know about the many guides for survival in hostile environments, be > it a desert, the urban jungle or the Lug. > If you want to become a member of this collective, there are a few things > you should do and many things you should not even dare to think about. Here > we go: > Always note that current Leica management does not know its business. > Produce a list of features that are lacking in current Leica products and a > list of products they do not even manufacture. Then announce that it is > obvious "they" should make those things, as it is evident where the money > is. > Always note that the M3 is way better than the M6. Never give facts, but > remark that you know from highly qualified people within Leica or from > independent repairpersons, who for obvious reasons want to stay anonymous > that the M6 is a piece of crap, jeopardizing its legend by using some > plastic parts. If you want to very popular, then hint that there is even a > Japanese influence behind current Leica products. > Always exclaim that you will never trust facts, as facts are EITHER > worthless as not being releveant for a working photographer OR being > delivered by persons who obviously are untrustworty as they seem to know too > much. Expand on this by noting that anyone who is consistently positive > about Leica or Leica-oriented products that they must be paid to be > positive. > Be very careful to make at least two critical and one very negative remark > per week about current leica managament and current Leica products to > bolster your credibility. If you have nothing new to say, just repeat what > you said before: better to repeat your own stories than have to listen to > someone else's nonsense. > Chop to pieces anyone who dares to note that he just buys Leica because he > likes it or has the money for it. Leica is for cognoscendi like yourself. > If someone asks you to explain your point (any point), stay very calm and > remark that you have used Leicas for at least two decades, that you own a > lot of hard earned equipment and that this is enough qualification. Reagon > even became president on a flimsier base. If you wish to kill your opponent, > remark that you have friends who are real photographers. > > Always show superior knowledge and a firm command of the act of Leica > photography to say that current Leica lenses employ glass elements from > japanese factories and that MTF graphs are worthless as they are designed > for flat objects. When asked to explain why this is relevant, you can easily > hide your ignorance by referring to an article that you have some where in > your file or that you have heard it from a real expert. > On the other hand feel free to refer to the MTF graphs published on the > Internet if you need evidence that a non-Leica lens is as good as a leica > lens, or the other way around. > Occassionally indicate that you have access to inside information, as you > are close with high ranking Leica officials and you know more than you may > tell. It is safe to do so, as you may not reveal anything and so nobody > knows what you really know. > Publicly distrust anyone who has closer contacts with the company officials > that you have: they do not know where to draw the line. > Always disqualify persons who are supposed to be on Leica's payroll. But > always refer to the books of Kisselbach and Osterloh as the best sources for > true Leica info. They must have the real info as they are/were inside the > company. The obvious inconsistency can be easily countered by the fact that > BMW owns Rolls-Royce and that is no problem at all. > Never engage in a real discussion. That is boring and dangerous as you would > have to change your mind or viewpoint. If there is a remote possibility that > a serious discourse about Leica photography is emerging, you have two > escape routes: start a discussion about the use of filters on a Leica lens > or about the need to blacken your red dot on the camera OR throw in a few > remarks about pornography in current photography. > Follow these guidelines and you will survive easily. > > Erwin > > > >