Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3
From: "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 20:18:05 -0500
References: <011101c0a9c4$71fa7f20$56eda918@telecaster.twmi.rr.com>

The 50/1.5 is descended from the 1927 original, designed by Berthele.
wonderful lens.


Edward Kieltyka wrote:

> Dante A. Stella <dante@umich.edu> wrote (edited):
>
> > Sonnar is nothing more than a trade name.
> >
> > Contax is currently a big abuser of the Sonnar name. Even the
> > 90/2.8 G-Sonnar is not a Sonnar. It's an Ernostar, but since
> > Contax can use the name Sonnar it does. Contax hasn't made a
> > real Sonnar for G or in a compact since maybe the original T
> > in 1985.
> >
> > Sonnars are great in the 38 to 40mm range: you have the T
> > Sonnar 38/2.8, the Rollei HFT-Sonnar 40/2.8, the original Zeiss
> > Tenax 40mm f/2, and (I believe) the Contaflex TLR. All were
> > great fun.
>
> I have no idea whether or not the '50s vintage 50mm f/1.5 Sonnar (for
> Zeiss-Ikon Contax RF cameras) is the Real McCoy but it's a wonderful little
> lens. I found one late last year at a local shop for under $100
> (cosmetically a little worn, optically pristine) and have been knocked out
> by its performance.
>
> I presume Summicron and Summilux also fall into the trade name category.
> It's hard to imagine the new 28mm 'cron's design having much in common with,
> say, that of the 90mm 'cron.
>
> -Dave-

In reply to: Message from "Edward Kieltyka" <EKIELTYKA@twmi.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)