Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: meter's shmeters..step away from the meter!
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 11:57:08 -0800
References: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103080845430.13294-100000@bronze.lcs.mit.edu> <016301c0a7dd$bb678ab0$4d02a8c0@neurosoft.lan>

"Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" wrote:
> 
> > replacement as your electronic one.  It's all tradeoffs.  The
> 
> I find all differences as having mainly personal nature. I just
> cannot trust electronical cameras, maybe because I was
> making photos in really severe conditions (Iceland ice
> research expedition :) ) and experienced all possible faults,
> from frozen lens motors to dead batteries. Even Hassy
> failed there, but disassembly and some petrol helped.
><Snip> 

electronical!?
Depends.
Does it run the cameras CPU 
or does it simply make the meter in the camera go?
I don't think of the My as an electrocial camera.
Or any camera whose shutter is mechanical instead of electrical.

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

Replies: Reply from "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: meter's shmeters..step away from the meter!)
In reply to: Message from "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: meter's shmeters..step away from the meter!)