Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Lense testing...
From: firkin@netconnect.com.au
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 01:09:01 GMT
References: <20010225180248.8304.cpmta@c014.sfo.cp.net> <3A9965E5.7676ED3D@home.com>

John Hudson writes:

> Doug Herr wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 25 February 2001, "Austin Franklin" wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > ><SNIP> people claim that they readily see the difference and anyone that doesn't is
> > > blind as a bat and would be better off with an instamatic with a thumb print
> > > on the lense.  Interestingly enough, those that claim they can see a
> > > difference refuse to provide such evidentiary pictures.
> > >
> > 
> > There are also people who see no difference between photos made with Leica lenses and photos made with other brands, while others say the difference between brands is obvious.  My best guess?  different perception levels.
> 
> 
> I would be interested in reading an objective and rational explanation
> of what those differences are, if in fact they exist at all. Let's not
> match up Leica and point and shoot / wedding camera lenses but match up
> the highest calibre 35mm performers from say Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, and
> Olympus.
> 
> BTW, I have been an M user since 1965 and an Olympus OM user since early
> 1999 and subscribe to both the LUG and Olympus lists as do several other
> members of this list so obviously there are LUGGers who believe in other
> systems.
> 
> A reasoned discussion on the alleged superiority of Leica optics /
> mechanics might provoke some interesting thoughts. 
> 
> John Hudson

This discussion can only end in grief. No-one needs this. The systems are
different and the cameras serve different functions. All modern lenses are
capable of good to excellent performance, and it is generally regarded that
Leica lenses are amongst the best available. Personal observations are of
interest, but not too much beyond that. Numbers are of interest, but again
not much beyond that. The art of getting the image on film is what most
users are interested in, and it is that which can be altered. The
performance of the lens doesn't matter as you are aiming the camera. By all
means compare image quality from different lenses and makers, but lets not
get in a stew about it. After all there are more important issues -- such
as the passing of Don Bradman to worry about ;-0

Cheers

Alastair

Replies: Reply from MEBérubé <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Re:PAW 9 [Bérubé])
In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Lense testing...)
Message from John Hudson <xyyc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Lense testing...)