Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:18:49 -0800
References: <4.1.20010222072054.05e36d50@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <006d01c09d20$aaf0dc80$02001aac@terra.es>

Julian Thomas wrote:
> 
> > Want a good 400 film... Tri-X in Xtol 1:3 by hand, 1:1 in a JOBO. SHARP!
> >
>  I use xtol 1:1, 24deg 8 mins for Trix. I see a lot of people using 1:3.
> What differences would I see if I dev 1:3 - are people doing this for
> economy only?
> 
> Julian

A more diluted developing agent makes for better edge effects make for the
effect of sharpness 

and also better sharpness due to less sulfite, a preservative which also acts as
a silver solvent.

The increase in grain is not noticeable in 35mm even with faster films.

mark rabiner

In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400)
Message from "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@terra.es> (Re: [Leica] Re: Delta 400 vs Tmax 400)