Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My PAW week7 ( http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4293130051 )was using just an incident meter - and the light was complicated. The print is a straight scan - no tweaking. For me an incident meter is the simplest approach. I'm not clever enough to use a built-in meter ;-) Julian - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 5:09 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Banff & incident meter > Frank Dernie wrote: > > >>>>> Just use an incident meter. Always best when the light conditions are > likely to fool the assumptions inherent in using any reflective meter.<<<< > > Hi Frank, > > So true! > > The first camera to make me believe an in-camera meter was accurate was the > M5, prior to that I never shot anything without an incident meter and rarely > ever had bad exposures under the wildest light conditions. Simple operation, > read the light falling on the subject and away you go... click, click wham > bam thank you ma'am! > > Yep today I use M6 and R8 cameras and they are on the mark 99.9999999% of > the time. However! Sometimes the old incident light meter twitch comes to > play and out it comes..sort of a huggie bear blanket left over from being a > kid. :-) Or maybe a soother, well the single malt takes the place of the > soother today. ;-) > > But an incident meter is a truly good thing to have in ones bag anytime, > even if you only use it once a year, but that once may be the best time! As > that one time may save your butt! > > I realize these days there will be umpteen dozen rebuttals claiming it isn't > that simple as there are many variables etc etc etc etc etc.. > > Damn I must be getting paranoid at posting ! Like I don't care what anyone > says when I put years of experience against the book learners any day! ;-) > Keep it simple stupid, as rarely, note guys "rarely," do you have to be > concerned with an incident reading being completely off target! > ted > > Ted Grant Photography Limited > www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 12:02 AM > Subject: [Leica] Banff > > > > cheers Frank > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > > It is a possibility, although I do not want to drag one around. Instead, > I use > > > my hand and open up one stop if there is nothing suitable to meter on. > But > > > usually there is the road surface, or a tree or something else that can > act as > > a > > > grey card. >