Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: V35
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 08:05:28 -0800
References: <01C09114.B9E2DD00.jem.kime@cwcom.net>

Jem:

I used the 15 on my M3 DS, and the image area was just a shade bigger,
and I mean barely paper thick. Needless to say, I'm anticipating the
wear and tear of 70 years on that IIIa to ad a more "period" look to the
borders of the neg. area. Since my first filed carrier is more oversized
than I'm comfortable with on my R negs, maybe I won't have to do
anything yet. When I'm that close, sometimes the difference in the neg.
gate area can be just a single file stroke. It's a nerve-wracking job
with what is increasinbly a rare accessory.

Best,
 Slobodan 


Jem Kime wrote:
> 
> Slobodan,
> Although you might think the 15mm will produce a greater neg. size than the
> 21mm, remember that the distance from the film plane is what will determine
> that, not the focal length/angle of view of the lens.
> Having just had a look at them both from the rear of an M camera, the Super
> Angulon is much closer, around 8mm away rather than 16mm or so.
> But as you say, you can check the exact size after you've got your negs
> back.
> 
> Jem
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   S Dimitrov [SMTP:sld@earthlink.net]
> Sent:   07 February 2001 05:40
> To:     leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject:        Re: [Leica] Re: V35
> 
> Jem:
> 
> I got tired of waiting. Most of all, I started getting exasperated by
> the cavalier and flippant attitude from whoever answered the phone that
> day at the New Jersey Sloth. A member of the Lug had an extra carrier,
> still in the box, which they graciously sold to me at a very good price.
> Now I have three, the boxed one, a one sided glass carrier, and one
> without any glass, which I have since filed.
> I'm waiting on a IIIa, before I start filing my single glass carrier.
> It'll be matched to a 15mm, with the image area hopefully bleeding into
> the sprocket hole, at least more than my old 21f4. Once I make my test
> exposures, I'll use them as a guide for the filing.
> 
> Best,
>  Slobodan
> 
> Jem Kime wrote:
> >
> > Slobodan,
> > Ditto ;-)
> > I waited to find one second hand, eventually did, but then sold it on (or
> > returned it - I can't recall which) as it wouldn't give full black
> borders
> > with 21mm negs anyway.
> > I went to work with a file on an old ordinary carrier and now have the
> > strange edges to show for it!
> > e.g.
> > http://members.tripod.co.uk/JemK/Pic-A-Week/2.htm
> >
> > Jem
> >
> >

In reply to: Message from Jem Kime <jem.kime@cwcom.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: V35)