Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted Grant jotted down the following: > My humble opinion? I think you should have used the Victoria Light house > for your PAW 4, as I see that as an interesting composition and the smarts > to see and capture a seagull in flight at just the right point. I think I'm going to break the rules for PAW: I don't have time to take one good picture a week, but I do have about 45 rolls of film that I shot during the summer and autumn on my various trips. I'm going to select what I think is one good shot from these each week -- or if I actually manage to snap a good picture maybe that -- because this strict adherence to the "rules" isn't working. I'm with you: if I hadn't stuck to the "rules", I would have put the Victoria lighthouse as the week 4 shot. > I wonder where the hell I was looking when you shot it? Probably lying on > my back shooting the light house with the 15 mm. Yep -- and I have a great shot of that too! ;) > Your worst nightmare critic. ;-) Not at all: I appreciate your comments very much! M. - -- Martin Howard | Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | People don't like to be parameters email: howard.390@osu.edu | in an equation. www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +---------------------------------------