Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oliver, I had not thought about the comparison of this focal length to the 38mm Hassy. Thanks. - --- Oliver Bryk <oliverbryk@home.com> wrote: > Henry, I bought the 24mm for my M6HM after > considerable research because I > wanted a lens that gave results comparable to my > Hasselblad Superwide (38mm > or 1/2 normal focal length) for landscape > photography. I am not interested > in greater area coverage but in greater depth of > field. I like to create > images with what I call "foreground immediacy"; I > remember that Ansel Adams > called it "near-far composition". > Oliver Bryk > > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:00:21 -0800 (PST) > From: Henry Krzciuk <hkrzciuk@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Leica] Tips on using 24mm M lens > Message-ID: > <20010129170021.16901.qmail@web217.mail.yahoo.com> > References: > > During a weak moment, I purchased a 24MM for my > M6TTL. > I now have the 24mm, 35 f2 asph, 50 f2, and 90mm f2 > asph. > > I am interested in the types of situations that > people > use the 24mm vs say the 35mm. And I would like to > understand what they expect to be different besides > just the greater area covered. > > I have noticed that the frame in my viewfinder does > not appear to be level. I am going to be doing more > checking on this. > > I have tried shooting some people and it seems to do > this without unacceptable levels of facial > distortion. > The lens does appear to be very sharp. > > Again, I am interested in hearing what most people > have found to be the sweet situations for using this > lens. > > Thanks. > > > __________________________________________________ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/