Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Marc James Small jotted down the following: > No one at all has stated that the Visoflex was necessary with the extension > tube. What HAS been stated, in detail, is that there are TWO series of > Telyt lenses, one intended for use on the PLOOT and Viso I, and the second > series for use on the Viso II/IIa/III. The optical registration on these > units is different and, hence, the bare tube will not work to accomodate > the 22.5mm-longer Viso II/IIa/III lenses directly on the cameras and to > maintain infinity focus. A custom adapter, of course, could be made. Isn't that what the OUBIO adapter is? The difference in optical registration between a PLOTT/Viso I and a Viso II/IIa/III? M. - -- Martin Howard | Computer: (n) Something whose reaction Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | time is longer than its attention email: howard.390@osu.edu | span. www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +---------------------------------------