Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Metz 40 MZ-3i vs. Leica SF-20
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:53:18 -0800
References: <B699BD2C.C77C%Joseph@yao.com>

Good point. Would a 400D between the SCA and the flash affect anything?

Slobodan Dimitrov


"Dr. Joseph Yao" wrote:
> 
> Th correct SCA module for M6 TTL (and also the R8) is SCA 3501.  SCA 351 is
> for the pre-R8 cameras, namely R5, RE, R6 and R6.2.
> 
> Rgds,
> 
> Joseph
> 
> on 28/1/01 7:33 AM, S Dimitrov at sld@earthlink.net wrote:
> 
> > A metz 32 with a SCA 351 works well. Provides a lot of flexiblity.
> > Lithium AA keeps the unit light.
> >
> > Best,
> > Slobodan Dimitrov
> >
> >
> >
> > Yaniv Gur wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I feel it's time to buy a flash gun for my leica M6TTL. I am trying to make
> >> a decision between the leica SF-20 and the Metz 40 MZ-3i. Does anyone in the
> >> group have experience with the Metz? I'm trying to keep my kit pretty small
> >> and I've never seen the Metz and I suspect it's big and heavy. Also, I
> >> checked out all the vivitars but decided that TTL flash metering is
> >> important for me.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Yaniv

In reply to: Message from "Dr. Joseph Yao" <Joseph@yao.com> (Re: [Leica] Metz 40 MZ-3i vs. Leica SF-20)