Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm in a quandary. How does the 90/2 (last model before the APO) compare to the recent (or earlier) 90/2.8? On Erwin's site, he says it's no contest: the Summicron is a lesser lens. I have pointed out before, however, that I'm not an Erwinist: many things are more important to me than sharpness. Is the bokeh on the Summicron better? I take it the ergonomics aren't as nice -- seems to be a much larger and heavier lens. But if it throws a nicer image I'll be happy. Is it, for instance, comparable to a 50/2 Summicron? Similar design, optically? Bokeh? I'm more than happy with *that* lens. thanks, Douglas Cooper http://www.dysmedia.com