Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top
From: "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:47:41 -0500
References: <3A6FB641.7E061E68@CameraQuest.com> <v04011708b6963cb2098f@[208.187.35.179]>

Yeah, ask Voigtlander... er Cosina and Contax... er Kyocera and Rollei... er
Samsung and Nikon... er Mitsubishi...

Guy Bennett wrote:

> >Stephen Gandy jotted down the following:
> >
> >> alas, no "Leitz Wetzlar" -- oh well.  too good to be true.
> >
> >Why would they put "Leitz Wetzlar" on it?  The company is called "Leica" and
> >the place they are located in is "Solms".
> >
> >M.
>
> Another smart-ass question, Martin. What the hell should actual *facts*
> have to do with marketing???
>
> Miffed in L.A.
>
> Guy
>
> P.S. What is the proper emoticon for "miffed"? Could it be  :  |

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
In reply to: Message from Stephen Gandy <Stephen@CameraQuest.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)