Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Randy wrote: SNIP..... >>>>>>. A true professional is concerned with (and controls) the > entire image, often picking a lens and aperture setting > to control the overall effect, including using DOF > control to "focus" attention on the subject<<<<<< Hi Randy, I think it would be interesting if you would explain which discipline of photography you are talking about, Portrait, news, photojournalism or any of the other venues. I never in all my years ever heard of the bokeh thing until it surfaced on the LUG sometime ago and has been discussed, well some times a bloody fire storm of nonsense driving one absolutely crazy! :-) I'd bet a big pile of money that 99.9% of wire service and news photographers wouldn't know the word, nor would know what it meant unless they were exposed to it in some kind of photo forum. As a photojournalist I've used a pile of different glass, but I've never thought of using one for the OOF effect, but for capturing the subject in the best of light and content, which of course are the two main things to any photograph. Sure the out of focus background has some effect on a photograph providing one is using the right aperture, focal length, subject to background distance and others I've missed . For you to say ">>>>>>"__A true professional__" is concerned with (and controls) the > entire image, <<<<< is correct, but pushing it. However, not to the extent of switching lenses for some kind of out of focus esthetic effect, unless he's shooting peeling paint, rocks and ferns and non-breathing things! The rest of us are far more concerned with capturing the magical moment of content and light! I generally shoot using the widest possible aperture and highest possible shutter speed whenever I can make them work to give a correct, or close to, correct exposure. Yep and backgrounds on many occasions are well out of focus, but I still never related to it anymore than "being out of focus" as it should be. For esthetic value? Never, never, never! ted Ted Grant Photography Limited www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Heavysteam@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:21 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Users digest V19 #56 > <<But I'm always far more concerned about the "in focus part" and whether itmakes a good picture to start with! The out of focus is just the fluff>> > > I've heard this argument before and never accepted it. > Unless you blank out the defocused areas of your > pictures when you print them, they are just as much a > part of the image as the focused areas> ..Randy