Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh controversy
From: "Wilber Jeffcoat" <wilber@jeffcoatphotography.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:39:17 -0500
References: <20001226211258.13788.cpmta@c014.sfo.cp.net>

Thank you, so this then is a characteristic of the Leica lens and really has
nothing to do with the focal length. Next 250 f4 I see is mine.
Cheers Wilber
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Herr" <merlin@flyingemu.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh controversy


> On Tue, 26 December 2000, "Wilber Jeffcoat" wrote:
>
> >
> > Would you like to tell me why that is. I would think a longer lens would
be
> > less fussy than a shorter one. I think they are both of the same
relative
> > speed.  4 and 4.5
> > Cheers Wilber
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Doug Herr" <merlin@flyingemu.com>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 2:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh controversy
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, 26 December 2000, "austin@darkroom.com" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Some lenses exhibit a nice looking blurred background (Bokeh) when
> > > > > used wide open.
> > > >
> > > > > But is that why you choose to use a lens in a particular
situation?
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely!  My 75/1.4 is probably corroded on by now ;-)  For the
type
> > of work I bought my M for, I almost always shoot wide open.  To me,
Leica
> > and great bokeh are synonomous.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Same here.  The 250 Telyt lets me work in more situations than the
N****
> > 300 ED f/4.5 because the 250 isn't so fussy about backgrounds.
> > >
> > > Doug Herr
> >
>
> I doubt I can say *why* but what I've seen in my photos is that the 300
f/4.5 ED Nikkor produces very harsh background areas with a pronounced
double-line effect if the background is close enough to the plane of focus
that it's not totally obliterated.  The 250 Telyt (and the 280 f/4.8
Telyt-V) produce a much smoother background that's much less distracting.
Since the vast majority of my photos are closer to eye-candy than to
photojournalism the overall look of the photo is as important to me as the
content is.
>
> Doug Herr
> Sacramento
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/telyt
> ___________________________________________________
> The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
>  Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
>  250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
>  http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Bokeh controversy, 250/4 lens)
Reply from Ted <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Bokeh controversy)
In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <merlin@flyingemu.com> (Re: [Leica] Bokeh controversy)