Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Except that you can probably bring your action in small claims court for little or no expense. Bryan - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 9:53 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Fraud/Breach of Contract > Last I heard, misrepresentation of a material fact is grounds for rescission > of a contract, without having to establish intent to defraud; so, if the > dealer said you're lens purchase entitles you to the rebate, you can argue > you're entitled to rescind, return the lens, and get your $$ back. > Depending on the integrity of your dealer, you may have to sue to do so, > which probably isn't worth the $150, in either monetary terms or emotional > terms. > > Tom > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 11:30 AM > Subject: [Leica] Fraud/Breach of Contract > > > > Martin Howard opined: > > > > > > > > You'd have to establish intent in a fraud case. In a breach of > contract, > > > the facts would speak for themselves. > > > > > > > You are wading into waters deep and swift, Martin. Best not to go in > unless > > you're wearing a lawyer. > > > > -- Paul > > Paul Arnold > > 22 Sunrise St. > > Dillon, Montana > > Visit MY GALLERY at: > > http://www.geocities.com/osprey59725/index.html > > > >