Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Erwin, I will very much look forward to reading about your experiences on this journey. To some extent, it is a journey which we're all on--the quest for making better photos. Out of the three elements you define here--style, content, and optical quality--I feel the potential for progress lies primarily with the first. When I consider what it is about a photo that captures my attention, the answer is usually the vision of the photographer. I've seen beautiful photos on any kind of subject--the content almost seems irrelevant. And they've been shot with a variety of glass, even (gasp) Nikon or Canon. It's the heart and eye of the photographer that seems to come through in the photos that grab me. I don't believe HCB spends much time worrying over optical quality (I could be wrong); I think his photos speak to me because of his love for the subject matter and for seeing itself. He's madly in love with Paris and it shows. He sees more in that city than most of us ever will (except by virtue of his images). Same thing with Winogrand and New York City. Or Harvey and Cuba. So, for me at least, there will always be the challenge of better and better equipment and technique (I'm learning all the time, and the posts here by you and others are a great boon), but the biggest challenge by far is discovering what I love, what stirs my blood, and photographing _that_ in a way (style) that is in accord with my passion for it. That challenge defies thought and analysis, as it is really rooted more in the heart than the head. But I can tell you already, after only starting on this journey eight months ago, the photos I've taken that stand apart from the others are the ones where I wasn't really thinking at the time--I was merely following my eye's natural proclivity toward beauty. Dan