Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PRE-visualization
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 20:32:59 -0800
References: < <45EDA71CFF25D411A2E400508B6FC52A75577B@orportexch1.internal.nextlink.net>

At 08:11 PM 12/4/00 +0000, Dean Chance wrote:
>
>AA'S ability to previsualize the
>results he wanted, then make the adjustments at every phase in the
>production of the finished image still impresses me. Yet, I am not moved.
>Other people are.
> 

Can someone explain the term PRE-visualization? Is this visualization
before visualization? Or is it just simply "visualization?"

If you visualize something, you are doing it before the act. If you
pre-visualize something, you are visualizing it before you visualize it
before the act.

Merrium Webster doesn't seem to understand pre-visualize.

Jim

Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: PRE-visualization)
Reply from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] PRE-visualization)
Reply from Rob McElroy <idag@pce.net> (Re: [Leica] PRE-visualization)
Reply from Ted <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] PRE-visualization)
In reply to: Message from "Rodgers, David" <david.rodgers@xo.com> (RE: [Leica] Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, high qua ilty porn)