Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If a 90mm will be primarily used for portraits, I do assume that you will have to stop down to 4 or 5.6 to get decent DoF for the depth of the face. Use an aperture of f/2 and at 1 to 1.5 meter only the pupil will be in the sharpness plane. If that is the case, the classical 3-element Elmar 4/90 brings amazingly good performance. Yes there are older lenses that are outstanding -:). In the 2.8 category the current Elmarit-M 2.8/90 is by far the best. The first Elmarit 2.8/90 was not so good at close range and had to be stopped down a few stops to get the best results. The first Tele-Elmarit lags a bit behind this version. The second Tele_Elmarit version is in the same league as the Elmar-C for the CL. and both are better (higher contrast, better definition of fine detail) than the two predecessors. This second Tele-Elmarit (the very short one) has one caveat: it has a sealed optical cell, so repairs are not so easy. In my view you should look first in the f/4 category for a 3 element Elmar. In the f/2.8 category the current Elmarit is best, at some distance followed by the Tele-Elmarit-M 2.8/90 and the Elmar-C 4/90. If you search for the older versions, the first Elmarit might be the best choice, especially stopped down. In the f/2 catagory the Apo-version is simply THE lens for portraiture. This ranking is focussed on portraiture applications, that is stopped down to 5.6. I did not include flare and other characteristics as I assume these are not relevant for this type of imagery. Erwin