Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] the 35mm Summilux ASPH trumps all
From: Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:40:06 -0800 (PST)

Mike Johnston wrote:
(snip) This is not a criticism, just an observation: have you ever
noticed how much enthusiasm there is on this list for films of very
high speed, lenses of very high speed, flash...and tripods! A person
could pick any one of the four and get by in 98% of the low-light
situations encountered in general photography, I'd say. (I sometimes
get a vision of an earnest Lugger with an M6 and Noct mounted on a
heavy tripod, with a big potato-masher flash, using T-Max P3200 film
pushed to E.I. 1600 <g>.)

With most things in photography, sensible compromises work best. Pick a

fast enough film, a fast enough lens, and then reserve flash or tripod
for when they're really needed.
======================================================================
Couldn't agree more. And if you're an R user, like me, the extra weight
of all that low-light gear is an even more serious consideration. 

Regards,

=====
Ray

"The trouble with resisting temptation is
 you never know when you'll get another chance!"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/