Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Put me in Thailand, Cambodia or Timbuktoo, and my first choice would be to >grab my Contax G2 and go. Whether the film I use may be colour or B&W, the >ease of use of the Contax G2 brings home a whole lot of well exposed easily >printable negs, and sharp images. Why? 'Cos with this G2 beast, the >AF+AE+motor drive alone would more than allow me to concentrate on the >picture at hand without the hassle of focussing and getting the right >shutter speed/F-stop.... >Dan K. dan, while i wouldn't flame you for preferring the g2 over the m6 for your photography, i do take issue with the commonly made argument that the manual setting of exposure controls inevitably leads to missing pictures. this view presupposes that we are all out there snapping away at quick moving scenes that allow no time for reflection about which shutter speed/aperture combination would be best to capture the image at hand, and that is not always the case. it also implies that focusing and setting exposure are burdensome chores that detract from what photography is all about: composition, and i don't think that is true either. i'd say that 95% of my shots are correctly exposed, because i take a moment to consider the image i'm after, meter the scene and set exposure accordingly. if i'm roaming the streets, i'll have the camera preset for the lighting in question, and the lens set to the hyperfocal distance so i can react quickly should i see some fleeting something i want to capture on film. i have never felt that i missed a shot 'cause i was 'fiddling with camera,' though i've missed plenty because the camera was still in my bag/i wasn't paying enough attention/i was lazy/etc. when i'm prepared and awake, i don't think i could react any quicker with an ae/af camera than i can with a leica. guy