Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]R6.2, 60 2.8, 135 or 180 2.8 for me.....later maybe a 35 (!!!) What the hell am I talking about...I don't use the Nikons I already have :) :) :) Walt On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Mark Rabiner wrote: > Walter S Delesandri wrote: > > > > Thanks for the post, Tom...yes, the M-fast-long lens combination > > is difficult for anything shorter than about 10 feet, particularly > > wide open...the RF HAS the accuracy, if the infinity and close > > focus compensation are right on...but even then, with a .72 or less, > > it's hard to see, sometimes..... > > I'd like to have an R6.2 and cuppla lenses, but I don't do enought > > photography to make the transition from my >sack< of Nikon Fs collected > > over the years... > > > > Walt > > > Me too exactly!! > But all i want SLR 35mm wise is a 100 macro, maybe 60 macro, and a 180 2.8. > Cant decide between the R6.2 or R8... > or a Contax RTS or other Contax bodies and it's Zeiss much cheaper lenses. > Or the almost out there Contax N1 as it might be more fun to play with than my > Macintosh G4! > Mark rabiner >