Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras as checked luggage
From: "William Pierce" <bicpi@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:29:14 -0800

Martin -

I 'm the photographer who wrote the article that B. D. Colen refers to, the
one that suggested disguising your expensive Haliburtons by putting them
inside cheap suitcases.  That presupposes you own a lot of Haliburtons.  If
you don't, you may spend more on Haliburtons than airfare.

For a one-time trip, some of these suggestions may be of use.  Put your most
expensive and fragile items in a bag or case that you can carry on with you.
Don't necessarily think camera bag.  A backpack will let you carry more
weight comfortably than a coventional bag and not attract much attention.
One of the cameras may even go over your shoulder, but keep it under your
jacket in the airport.  Less fragile equipment can be wrapped in bubble wrap
and sent in your conventional hard case luggage.  The large Pelican Camera
Cases on wheels will pass off as conventional luggage and give you a big
equipment case or suitcase for future use.  Forget about putting any clothes
or toiletries in your suitcase until you've packed all your gear.  When you
are shipping your clothes home, inquire about shipping services that will
also handle any gear that is still left unpacked, insure it and get it
through customs.

I think you probably know this already, but I didn't want to go down in
history as the man who suggested you spend the family fortune on
Haliburtons.

All the best,
Bill Pierce

Replies: Reply from "Sandy Carter" <sc-photo@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Cameras as checked luggage)