Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Mike, Are you interested in the .58 finder because you already have a .85 or would you like to use just the .58? I find that I still use my .72 finder M6 because I can't really see the 35 frame lines on my .85 since I wear glasses. I do like the .85 for my longer glass. Steve > From: Mike Johnston <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:47:41 -0500 > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Subject: [Leica] Black paint classic > > >> So, if they were to offer, say, an M6 "classic" in some reconfiguration, >> perhaps even >> in black paint, at a reasonable price (like the LHSA edition) - how many here >> would >> be tempted? If we ask loudly enough and in numbers, we may get it! > > > I find myself in the rather odd position of not being particularly > interested in any of Leica's current products. I do like black paint and the > .58 finder, but I'd rather not have a TTL--I'm used to the smaller shutter > dial and the traditional direction, and I find the taller top plate > disconcerting. I'm not saying the TTL's worse--I'm sure it's very nice. Just > that I'd rather not own one. > > I'm also interested in a couple of the older lenses more than the new ones, > although I'll probably end up getting a 35/2 ASPH at least for a while, just > to get to know it. Again, no judgement implied, just that it tends to be > older things that happen to attract my interest. > > On the R side (which I'm not currently shooting, but I've just bought an R > lens so I will be again soon), I'm totally, completely uninterested in the > R8--again, I'm sure it's a lovely camera for those who are interested--it's > just very definitely not my cup of tea. (Yes, I have shot with one, albeit > briefly.) I think I would not be interested in using an R8 if it came my way > for free. It just doesn't suit my tastes and my style. So, I find myself > looking at older R cameras. > > A classic M6 in black paint would suit me perfectly. Particularly if it had > three framelines (35, 50, 90) instead of 6 and no capability for the motor > drive, thus restoring the brass gears and the silken feel of the M4. > > For this reason (i.e., that I want it), no product of this description will > _ever_ see the light of day <g>. > > But I *would* like to see something...subversive. Unabashedly utilitarian. > Anti-collector. Again, nothing against the collectors. I just get a bit > overstuffed with all the limited-edition, carriage-trade marketing gimmicks, > one after the next. It's all so damned...precious. I know, I know, it's what > they feel they need to do to survive, and that's fine with me. I just don't > feel I'm being served. > > It would be nice if there were a workingman's Leica. > > It does kind of bug me that I don't really covet any of the products Leica > is currently selling. I don't know why it should, but there it is. > > Late night musings after a long but interesting day. > > --Mike > >