Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A "Brookie"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Haven't used that slur in years, one of my GREAT photo buddies 20 yrs ago (Mark Wells-Houston) was one, too...... Walt On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:47:48 -0500 Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> wrote: > That was back when a white wedding gown meant something. It does not mean the > same thing today were everything is rehearsed befor the wedding. . > > Joe Codispoti wrote: > > > In the sixties I photographed weddings to finance my photo education at > > Brooks Institute. > > > > In order to avoid pitfalls, and to establish a personal style, I looked at > > the portfolios of several local photographers. What I saw was more or less a > > record of who attended the wedding, what they ate, and how long they stayed. > > I tried to sway prospective brides towards a more casual, intimate, and > > personal approach to recording the event. I learned quickly that the bride > > to be wants what her girlfriend had when she was married: posed, perfectly > > aligned and centered, stiff people grinning at the camera. > > > > Most objectionable to me are the many smaltzy, contrived, and phony photos > > such as that of the groom being "dragged" to the altar by his buddies. Or > > that of the father of the bride showing empty pockets and sporting a forced > > look of distress. The worst I recall was that of an enormous bride seated at > > the edge of the matrimonial bed with the groom kneeling on the bed behind > > her unbuttoning her dress; no doubt the photo was meant to portray a prelude > > of things to come. > > > > A leading local photographer goes as far as photographing the bride while > > she dresses. The sequence starts with undies. But I have to admit that the > > photos are tasteful and technically excellent (no doubt he selects those > > brides that do justice to Victoria Secret). > > Most of his wedding photos have the look of studio lighting. In fact he > > practically creates a temporary studio setting at the church complete with > > studio strobes, assistants, and music. > > > > So, you see Simon, give them what they want and charge them accordingly. > > > > Joe Codispoti > > > > From: "Simon Stevens" <simon@camera-craftsman.com> > > > I'm thinking about changing the way I do weddings for my business. I > > > really don't like doing all the dumb groups and it's frustrating herding > > > disinterested people around like a sheepdog while all the interesting > > > photographic opportunities are elsewhere. I'm wondering what experience > > > people on the list might have marketing candids-only wedding > > > photography? I'd like to do it in black and white if possible, and > > > hopefully take the marketing (and the pricing) a little upmarket to > > > distinguish myself from the high street wedding crowd. > > > > > > Finally, maybe you might like to take a look at some pictures along > > > these line which I took at a wedding reception last weekend. The address > > > for the quickie page I have placed them on is: > > > http://www.camera-craftsman.com/wedding > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Simon Stevens > > > > > > >