Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina - you responded to Mark, and since I do a lot of landscapes with the Leicas, here's a couple of quick responses from my perspective: 1) Over the last 30 years I have collected a range of lenses that would cost me tens of thousands of dollars to duplicate in medium or large format equipment. So I have used the Leicas because they are there. 2) Some of the best landscapes are taken in those brief moments when fog is lifting, the storm is descending, or times in general when every few seconds you have an almost completely different look ( at least that's how light often happens here on the Redwood Coast of California). With the Leica, I can fire away as the light rapidly changes, both more quickly and less expensively than an equal amount of pictures with a large format camera. With the large format, I have waited for the light to get "just a little better", when all it did was get worse. With the Leica, I would have shot a couple of "insurance" shots while waiting and still perhaps have come home with a worthwhile photo. 3) The same amount of large format gear would take a pack mule to haul what I can carry alone over long distances with Leica. 4) I can enlarge landscapes beautifully with my trusty Leitz Focomat 1c. 5) I can put together beautiful slide programs without the hassle and expense of duplicating. 6) When the great decisive moment happens while I'm out photographing the landscape, I can switch to photojournalistic mode with the flip of a tripod quick-release! Regards, Gary Tree LUGger > But, if your purpose is technically perfect landscapes with a tripod on > slow film, why would you use Leica M's and not medium or large format? > Is there any advantage to an M in that situation? > >