Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I > realize that the 90 apo version is the newer and presumably better model of > the 90 f/2s available. I would rather sacrifice the extra stop in favor of > the extra focal length but I don't want to sacrifice the quality I saw from > the 75 1.4. Am I over thinking this? Any opinions appreciated. Quality is a relative thing. The 75/1.4 has amazing bokeh that will snot the rocks off of the 90/2... If you don't know what bokeh is, it is the rendering of the out of focus areas, and something, in my opinion, Leica lenses excel in. I personally use the 75/1.4 almost full open every opportunity I get...and the results are outstanding. The 90/2 is in its own right, a simply amazing lense also, and you won't go wrong with either one. I have posted an excellent article on bokeh on my web site: http://www.darkroom.com/MiscDocs/bokeh.pdf If you have any trouble getting it, please let me know and I can email it to you or put it on the FTP server.