Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I believe the study (model) is basically correct. It is impossible, using reactions alone, to determine exactly where a fast ball will be when it arrives at the batsmans position. The batsman does not use reaction alone. He uses the same technique that smart cameras use to judge exposure. The scene is compared to a built in memory bank matrix for an an exact match The batsman, by practicing constantly, can pre-judge the eventual position of the ball from previous experience. Conditioned reflex. This is why sports like baseball and cricket have very strict rules regarding the weight and size of the ball and its method of delivery and from which position. Its to give the batsman half a chance to build up an exact match dictionary. Any bowler playing cricket knows the fun to be had by substituting a tennis ball half way through an over. Back to photography Handholding a camera degrades the equipment performance. Apart from certain Eastern disciplines to control internal body action, I can't see that practise will improve the situation to any significant degree. IMHO. IMHO. IMHO. Alan - ---------- > From: Dan Cardish > This reminds me of a study which proved that a major league baseball player > is simply unable to react fast enough to hit a pitched ball, considering > how quickly it takes the ball to arrive at home plate. > > And yet, they do hit them.