Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>From: Krechtz@aol.com [mailto:Krechtz@aol.com] >If you think it appropriate to deny the possibility of concensus among >members, I will not quibble. What? No consensus among members? I disagree! And: >... that her evident lack of interest and experience in >photography tends to skew her perspective and vitiate her >authoritativeness and authenticity as a commentator on >the social and psychological dynamics of photography. You must be one of the brainy ones Arthur was talking about :-) Seriously though, the distinction between critic and philosopher is an important one, especially in this instance. SS is almost a metacritic - a critic of _an_ art rather than a critic of examples of that art. Paul