Re: [Leica] More lens trouble

[Krechtz@aol.com]

In a message dated 9/23/00 9:06:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time, RDD5TK@aol.com 
writes:

<< Since I am fairly new to Leica, please tell me, is this 
 type of thing common or am I experiencing a run of bad luck?  >>

I recently bought a new M6TTL .72, which had a misaligned rangefinder.  The 
factory rep got me a replacement within one week.  I cannot complain about 
the service, but I was more than mildly surprised by the defect, after using 
an M3 off and on for about 25 years.   New bodies and new lenses appear to me 
to be lighter than previous versions like the heavily chrome plated brass 50 
and 35 Summicrons I was accustomed to.  Focusing mounts of more recent lenses 
 do not feel quite as strong or smooth, nor do diaphragm click stops feel as 
firm or positive.  
I surmise that certain trade-offs have been made in the designs of lenses and 
selection of materials, in favor of weight reduction.  I suspect this leaves 
less room for error in the assembly process and for hard or extreme use in 
the field.  Meanwhile, I have to say that the lighter weight of the newer 
lenses makes them easier to handle, especially where continous shooting is 
required and fatigue becomes a factor.  Moreover, by objective standards, 
they generally produce images of enhanced quality.
Therefore, to address your question directly,  I have concluded generally 
that failures are probably more likely to occur with recent or latest vintage 
equipment than with the "iron horses" we aspired to own when we were growing 
up.  I base this assumption on what I have read, old and new equipment I own 
and use, and a vastly greater quantity of gear I have handled in stores and 
at many camera shows, as well as discussions with numerous dealers in new and 
used Leica items.
However, your experience should not necessarily be regarded as typical.  All 
things considered, I believe you have had bad luck, and we all empathize.

Joe Sobel