Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's something that you live with. The trade off for having an incredibly fast lens on a rangefinder is that, because it must be BIG, it will block part of the viewfinder. On the other hand, you get all the advantages of a rangefinder. I too had the 75 Summliux and got rid of it, not because of the viewfinder problem, but because I wanted to see the magnification, which I can do with a reflex (although I now have a 75 2.5 voightlander lens because when I am carrying just an M and 35, I can throw it in my pocket and have some flexibility.) The Noctilux appears to be an amazing lens with magical properties, and if you have the need for a real fast lens for low light photography, don't sweat the small stuff - like viewfinder cut-off......Better to be able to photograph an image, even if part of your view of it is obscured, than to see the whole thing but not be able to capture it on film. :-) B. D. http://www.a-day-in-our-life.com A Day In Our Life... Documentary Photography of American Families > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Peter Shier > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 1:12 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Using 60mm filter size lenses > > > I tried a Summilux-M 75/1.4 on my M6 TTL 0.85, and although it is a > fantastic lens, I decided to return it because I could not stand > the loss of > the lower right corner of the viewfinder. I was strictly an SLR person > before this (Nikon F3, N80) and losing TTL viewing was one thing, > but losing > a 1/4 of the viewfinder was a bit much for me. > > I am using a Summicron-M 50/2 now and loving it (amazingly sharp) but I'd > also like to try a Noctilux. I am afraid of the same problem with its 60mm > filter size. Am I missing something here, or is this just > something that you > all live with? > > Thanks, > Peter > >