Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ken Lai wrote: >I have the 24mm lens and >finder already but is thinking of getting the 21 as well but (i) I do not >want to spend 300 dollars on another finder and (ii) I don't want to keep. . . . I've seen this question repeatedly on this list in some form or another (can I use my M3 window to see the 35mm field, etc. . . ) I completely fail to understand in every single one of these cases why someone would put a two thousand dollar piece of glass in front of a two thousand dollar box and then cheap out on a device to figure out where the edges of the image are. If people are so intent on saving money, a Nikon F body will show you 100% of the frame for a cost less than a single Leica finder, and you can buy a whole set of lenses for it for less than a Leica 21mm lens. I don't even understand it when it's a $300 Summaron on a beat-up M-3 and you can pick up a rudimentary finder for another $70. I couldn't live that way--I won't buy a lens until I can afford a finder for it, two caps, a hood, and a UV filter to protect my investment. - --Michael _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.