Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 28/8/00 1:07 AM, Krechtz@aol.com at Krechtz@aol.com wrote: > It is a fact of photographic life that in > many instances out of focus areas may occupy a significant amount of space > within a frame. What that area looks like surely merits at least some > consideration on the part of the photographer. Some but not much: that is my point. It can become an unhealthy preoccupation IMHO because there is no way of measuring or quantifying it in practice, particularly with a rangefinder camera. on 28/8/00 2:06 AM, Krechtz@aol.com at Krechtz@aol.com wrote: > No more so than reading MTF curves or other reports based on measured or > measurable performance characteristics or criteria, in order to choose which > lens to purchase or use. Hi Joe, Firstly, any tips on how to get hold of the HCB interview video? I couldn't find it on amazon (though I did get the earlier Sarah Moon documentary on him: very amusing). As for bokeh... how many people carry MTF charts around and consult them before taking a photo? How many 50/2 lenses do you carry with you and how many would you carry with you in an ideal world to get the best bokeh for different situations? I like the overall imaging characteristics of the Leica lenses I have and that is why I use them but like most photographers a palette of different lenses means different focal lengths, max apertures, macro, zoom etc and not different bokeh. Bokeh is indubitably one of those imaging characteristics and it is interesting to know about it but nice bokeh is sufficiently low down in my list of photo priorities to make the chances of carrying a selection of identical focal length and max aperture lenses for use at different distances, f-stops, lighting conditions and angles to get better bokeh nil: the problem is that bokeh is not a constant or measurable quality since all these factors affect each lens and image. I have never heard of any photographer carrying a selection of lenses for their different bokeh qualities - have you? I use a variety of 50mm lenses but it is the focussing characteristics, maximum aperture and weight that dictate which one I put in my bag or on the camera. The overall look of a particular lens is something I get to know the more I use a lens but the qualities of the in-focus part of the image (i.e. the subject) are always (or at least 99.9% of the time) going to dominate the attention of any viewer unless there is a serious content problem with the photo. Whether the background is blurred or not is of course a creative choice dictated by the aperture and focal length of the lens: the particular characteristics of that blur with lens A vs lens B seems to me to be too abstruse to worry about and again I ask for some evidence to show me which photos are made or lost due to bokeh characteristics. Sure I can see a difference in the examples people have given but never yet have I seen the real world application of this knowledge to create or even significantly enhance a great image. To me that is sufficient reason to not be too worried about it. It is a bit like arguing the merits of HP5 vs TriX: if the photo is good it doesn't matter but if it is not good then it also doesn't matter. That is not to say that these films are identical or one better than the other: what matters is making a choice and getting to know what you use well and not obsessing over the details of some Holy Grail of technical minutiae at the expense of actual image making. I recall Mike Johnston agonising over his role as lens connoisseur because it got in the way of picture taking: OTOH he got the whole bokeh thing going :^) One of the characteristics of photography is that there is always going to be a better technical approach to any photo you take whether it is a better tripod, a more appropriate film, a different aperture/speed combo whatever: one tries to optimise as much as practical but the introduction of new, unquantifiable and vague variables such as bokeh and nukeh confuses matters needlessly IMHO. Just press the button and get the image before it is too late! And now to take some photos! Bests Adrian - -- Adrian Bradshaw Corporate and Editorial Photography Beijing, China tel/fax +86 10 6532 5112 mobile +86 139 108 22292 e-mail apbbeijing@yahoo.com OR adrianpeterbradshaw@compuserve.com website: http://www.apbphoto.com Please note my new mobile number (as of August 1st) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com