Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hans-Peter.Lammerich@t-online.de schreef: > Yesterday at the bookshop a browsed through Günther Osterloh's new R > book (in German). It now covers the R8, the new zoom and apo lenses. I > already own older issues on M and R. > > Whilst older R bodies are still covered, the paragraphs on dicountinued > lenses have been deleted. This is really bad, because a budget minded > photographer may still want to read about them. On the other hand many > illustrations from the mid/early 1970s are still in, with contemporary > dress and hairstyle of course, showing how to hold the camera etc.! It > does not affect the content, but it certainly does no good to the image > of current Leica gear. The same goes for the really poor quality of the > these illustrations which apparently were scanned from older issues > where they look much better, indeed. > > Günther Osterlohs' books on R and M continue the tradition of Theodor > Kisselbach' s classic "Leica Handbook" and, in addition to the '"manual > and equipment" section represent a comprehensive introduction to > photography. But as the director of the "Leica Akademie", and thus > company employee, his statements are not very critical. His descriptions > of the lenses' performance read like offical press releases The wording > seems to be identical with the small manuals that are supplied with the > lenses and to some extend with brochures. They are very honest, but you > have to read carefully in between the lines like in a travel agency's > catalogue. My, older, M book for instance has a chapter on the pre-asph > Summilux-M 1,4/35 and a loose page on the newer, current Summilux-M > 1,4/35. The write-up on the pre-asph remains totally silent about the > well known short-falls of this lens which I indeed own, like and use a > lot (if not the most). On the other hand the insert on the asph mentions > the lack of flare and coma wide open. The reader can make his own > conclusions from that, but it certainly is not as it should be. > > It is the most "official" book available on the subject and thus should > have first hand info on equipment operations and specs. Some buyers will > certainly prefer a more independent point of view and a less > conservative attitude towards third party accessories and "creative use > of gear (eg. stacking or combining adapters). As a marketing tool and > expanded product brochure, however, it failed, coming years too late and > - hopefully - will be outdated again after photokina.. > > Hans-Peter Hi, Hans-Peter, Is the printing-quality of your copie as poor as mine? Some pictures are very grey and dull. For instance pages: 54,116,164/165,235 etc. The picture on page 63 # 50 is up side down. Where stayed the good old quality of Umschau Verlag?? I have sent my copy back to my bookseller (Lindemann's in Stuttgart, BRD) and they tried to find a good one for me. But all the copies they had, were poor in printing. It is a pity!!!!!!!! Kind regards, - -- Fred Hess Den Haag NL tel +31 70 3258312 fax +31 70 3258634 ______________________________________________________ _o With both feet _-\<,_ on the ground (_)/ (_) you won't get far...?! ______________________________________________________