Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, photo C was misfocused (I hope :-( ), and I was tempted to leave it out. Dan C. At 01:50 PM 23-08-00 -0400, Dan Honemann wrote: >Seems we're all in agreement on A and D. Interesting that a couple folks >are convinced A is the Nikkor (I liked Paul C's comments on the bokeh as >evidence). > >I'd like to hear your (David's) reasons behind the guesses. > >C is so soft that I Paul may be right in his suggestion that it's >mis-focused. The out of focus area is also considerably softer as well, >however. I'd have guessed C was opened up a stop or two and mis-focused, >but it's more likely a result of camera shake (or a lousy lens). > >Dan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of David >> Binder >> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 1:31 PM >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Lens challenge >> >> >> Photo A is Summilux >> Photo D is Summicron >> >> -David Binder (tell you why if I'm right) > > > >