Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To 'test' lenses all stopped down to 5.6 and then shooting handheld, is not the most meaningful act and conclusions based on these results are bound to be valueless. It has been repeated so often, that at 5.6 all current and well corrected lenses perform very well and whatever differences in fine detail rendition and micro contrast are available, the handheld shooting, by vibration and focusing inaccuracy will degrade these differences. I know that many persons assume that a practical user test in normal shooting situations is to be preferred as it seems to simulate the normal use of a lens. In a way it does and if the user is satisfied wih such a test, any argument or proof that a lens from one of the 4 or 5 topmarques is better/as good/not as good as another one is a pleasurable but futile way of killing time. Erwin